Peer Review Policy

Geographers Today follows a rigorous and transparent peer-review process to ensure academic quality and integrity.

  • All submitted manuscripts undergo a double-blind peer review, where the identities of authors and reviewers remain confidential to ensure unbiased evaluation.

  • Manuscripts are reviewed by subject experts for originality, relevance, methodological soundness, and ethical compliance, including plagiarism screening Policy Plagiarism.

  • The Editorial Board makes the final decision based on reviewers’ reports and may recommend revision, acceptance, or rejection of the manuscript.

  • In cases of ethical misconduct, plagiarism, or serious academic concerns, the journal reserves the right to reject, retract, or take corrective action as per editorial policies

Yearly Referred Journal

Geographers Today is a Yearly Referred and Peer-Reviewed Journal dedicated to publishing high-quality, original research in Geography and allied disciplines. The journal publishes one issue every year, ensuring that every manuscript receives adequate editorial scrutiny and expert evaluation before publication.

Being a Yearly Referred Journal allows sufficient time for rigorous manuscript screening, plagiarism checking, double-blind peer review, revisions, and final editorial assessment. This process helps maintain the academic quality, originality, and credibility of every published article.

Each submitted manuscript is evaluated by subject experts based on:

  • Originality of the research
  • Scientific and methodological quality
  • Relevance to Geography and allied disciplines
  • Accuracy of data and analysis
  • Quality of writing and presentation
  • Ethical compliance and proper referencing

Only manuscripts that successfully complete the review and editorial process are accepted for publication in the annual issue. Authors may be requested to revise their manuscripts based on reviewers’ comments before a final decision is made.

The editorial team is committed to maintaining transparency, fairness, confidentiality, and academic integrity throughout the review process in accordance with internationally accepted scholarly publishing practices.

Scroll to Top